X-Message-Number: 4162 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 1995 20:45:46 -0400 From: "Keith F. Lynch" <> Subject: Re: SCI.CRYONICS Liar > ... as far as I know there is no example of a statement that "should" > be regarded as clearly meaningful, yet is clearly unverifiable in > principle. Perhaps a reader will supply his favorite example (not > counting Goedelian "examples"). How about "there is no example of a statement that should be regarded as clearly meaningful, yet is clearly unverifiable in principle"? That statement appears to be meaningful, but I sure can't see how to verify it, can you? Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=4162