X-Message-Number: 4969 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Skrecky <> Subject: variations on a straight freeze Thanks to Joseph Strout with his analysis of my variations on a straight freeze. He is correct that the quick freeze technique will be fully effective only for a thin layer on the outside of the brain. However even in the center of the brain cooling rates of over 1 C should I think still be possible, which should help limit ice crystal damage somewhat. I would like to reemphasize that the hamburger technique is not a usuable option since the result would be (as Mike Darwin says) a tissue homogenate. The food industry uses quick freezing of foods to help retain their palatibility. As for the salami technique being impossible to impliment please refer to the latest issue of the Immortalist. Special tools are required for this to work, but it does work. However with only the salami technique both avoiding tissue fixation (microwave & freeze substitution) and freezing without cryoprotectant (quick freezing) it is a shame that even though this may be the best technique it would still never see use due to it's very poor visual acceptiblity to potential patrons. On goes the thinking cap.... Uh, the food industry injects calcium chloride into meat to tenderize it..... I got it! Inject cryoprotectant into an otherwise intact brain with a thousand very small diameter needles. As the needles are slowly inserted into the brain cryoprotectant is pumped through them leaving a trail of this solution along the entire length of each needle. Note: Permission is again here given for the following to be reprinted in any cryonics related publication that wishes to do so: VARIATIONS ON A STRAIGHT FREEZE By Doug Skrecky With the circulatory system being unavailable in many cases for cryoprotective perfusion what are the available options? The major arteries can be injected with cryoprotectant, but with the capillaries being blocked by coagulated blood no circulation is possible. Something better is needed. Based on my expectations of the quality of the treated tissue I group the following 6 techniques in order of increasing merit: 1. (Worst) Hamburger technique: Pretend that cryoprotectant perfusion was done and do the usual slow freeze. The result is hamburger. 2. Microwave technique: Microwaves can rapidly penetrate and fix tissue. Pack the brain with ice and place in a microwave with a turntable, which has been top rated by Consumer's Reports for uniformity of heating. Cook using pulses of radiation until well done. Treat brain with cryoprotectants by storing it in a concentrated cryoprotectant solution for a week. Store in freezer until needed. (Journal of Neuroscience Methods 53:81-85 1994) 3. Freeze Substitution technique: Freeze brain slowly to -10 C to limit ice crystal damage. Pickel brain in an anhydrous silica gel desiccant packed alcohol based cryoprotectant solution till ice has all melted. Baste in liquid nitrogen. 4. Quick Freeze technique: Freeze brain slowly to -10 C to partly dehydrate cells and reduce subsequent intracellular ice crystal formation. Then dunk in liquid propane/butane cooled with dry ice. Rapid freezing limits extracellular ice crystal growth. Then slowly cool further with liquid nitrogen vapour to limit the formation of cracks due to increased tissue brittleness. (Biophysical Journal Vol.64 1908-1921 1993 & Cryobiology Vol.31 506-515 1994) 5. Salami technique: Cut the brain into slices 5 mm thick. Cryoprotectants can rapidly diffuse into thin slices of tissue, thus preserving them well when they are frozen. The result is a Dagwood sandwich. (eg: see Cryobiology 24:120-134 1987) 6. (Best) Needle technique: Inject cryoprotectant into the brain via many very fine needles which are slowly inserted into the brain. Then do a quick freeze. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=4969