X-Message-Number: 5114 From: (David Stodolsky) Subject: Re: Government Date: Sun, 5 Nov 95 23:28:57 +0100 Saul Kent <> writes: > What evidence do you have that "a great deal" of "suspension research" >was funded by NASA? In the beginning, NASA was also engaged in theoretical work preparatory to sending people to the stars, which would obviously have required suspended animation. I helped a student get a job on one of their last funded projects, which was at Univ. of Louisville, when I worked there around 1980. I think it was with a small hibernator. I don't know the actual amounts that went into this, but the fact they were doing it at all is worth noting. If the funding had continued for another 15 years, we would be a lot happier now, I'm sure. > What evidence do you have that the opposition to "big government" in the >U.S. is supported by "a general anti-scientific attitude in this country"? It is not that opposition is supported, but that the cuts to research are supported a general anti-scientific attitude. > If the government had left Bill and I alone, I believe we would have >invested tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars in life >extension research in the past decade. This would be a more meaningful discussion if we had some numbers. Can reversible suspension be achieved for half a billion dollars? If so, then this kind of talk makes sense, if you want to be generous. Otherwise, political moves aimed at capturing government resources make more sense. Let's keep in mind that world-wide expenditure on weapons is running at about a trillion $ a year. In the USA, the new congress is pushing for a 25% increase in defense (death technology) spending. The only remotely solid numbers I have seen are from Merkle's paper "Large Scale Analysis of Neural Structures". He suggests $6 billion for capturing the information in a brain. Presumably, reversible suspension would have a higher price tag. dss David S. Stodolsky Euromath Center University of Copenhagen Tel.: +45 38 33 03 30 Fax: +45 38 33 88 80 (C) Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=5114