X-Message-Number: 5388 From: (Brian Wowk) Newsgroups: sci.cryonics Subject: Re: Trans Time, Inc. Date: 8 Dec 95 16:45:12 GMT Message-ID: <> References: <> <> <> <> <> <> In <> (hEpCaT) writes: >Your operation (and BPI's) is largely staffed by people who for the most part >had nothing to do with the day to day operations of Alcor back in the good old >days, so I think that for the most part a lot of you are untried. Ditto for Alcor. > You have to also factor in that your service provider euthanized >two Alcor patients and has severely threatened their operation. If you have reason to believe a felony(s) has been committed by present or former Alcor staff, then it is your civic duty to report this to the police. Difficult though it was, the publicity surrounding the Dora Kent case lead to explosive growth of Alcor in the years immediately following the crisis. Perhaps another murder investigation (this time with lots of indictments) is exactly what cryonics needs to get those 50% annual growth rates back. A truly great promotional strategy, which poses no threat to patients or Alcor operations whatsoever. How fortunate Alcor is to have members like you, Dave, who freely thow around murder allegations in a public forum for political purposes. >He was also >*directly* responsible for what happened to Alcor when Riverside County >Coroner's deputies raided the lab looking for Dora Kent; Mike has always freely admitted that his decision to bring Dora into the facility was a serious error. >But, as history clearly demonstrates, >nobody then that is now involved in your operation or Mike's had anything >to do with saving Alcor, and were in fact hiding from authorities! Yea, the thousands of dollars that I personally sent to pay for legal bills had nothing to do with it all. Neither did the tens of thousands paid by Saul Kent, and neither did his daily work with Carlos and Jerry throughout the crisis. Lawyer Chris Ashworth (found by Judy Sharp, as I recall) had nothing to do with it either. >> Please add me () onto your list of private document >> requesters. I'm always interested to see how prudently other organizations >> handle issues involving patient confidentiality and legal risk. >Funny request considering that you know all about this. I just plan on >mailing out my own accounts of cryonics history... Actually, Dave, I haven't a clue about what your own account of cryonics history is. It seems to stray farther from reality everyday. ---Brian Wowk Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=5388