X-Message-Number: 5545 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 02:13:08 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Skrecky <> Subject: ET please phone home EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE (from Longevity Report 38 April 1993) By Douglas Skrecky If contact is made with extraterrestrial intelligences (ETI) humanity could conceivably benefit in ways too numerous to describe. The mysteries of the universe which might otherwise take millenium for humanity on its own to uncover might be revealed overnight. The fountain of youth and the secrets of eternal happiness might then become the natural birthright of all of humanity. The United States government will shortly be commencing a $100 million dollar radio search for evidence to confirm the existance of ETI. What are its chances for success? Do wise ancient beings who could concievably become our benefactors really exist or are we all alone in the cosmos? Is there enough evidence to decide this issue? Most astronomers believe that numerous ETI species exist in our local galaxy. Biologists are however almost uniformly skeptical of the probability of the existence of any ETI species. Both types of scientist have access to all available information that could be used to decide this issue so their differing opinions must therefore only be ascribed to irrationality on the part of one or both groups. There exist only two possiblities: either the evidence is inconclusive so that both astronomers and biologists are therefore being irrational in their firmly held opinions or the evidence is reasonably conclusive and in favour of one "rational" camp and not in favour of the other "irrational" one. What is remarkable is that a very large percentage of scientists in either case must be irrational. Scientists it seems are human also. First of all the existence of ETI somewhere else in the cosmos is not really an issue. Not only do galaxies contain an "astronomical" number of star systems and not only does our "local bubble" universe contain an "astronomical" number of galaxies, but physicists now suspect that the entire cosmos may contain an infinite number of "bubble" universes. No matter how low the odds are for ETI on a given planet, with so many planets to consider (possibly infinite) the existence of ETI is assured as long as those odds are non zero. We exist, therefore those odds are non zero and therefore trivially ETI does exist out there -somewhere. The only real issue regarding the existence of ETI species is whether they live near enough for us to contact them. For this we can reduce the question to "Do ETI species exist in our galaxy?". In order to judge the odds for such galactic ETI (GETI) we must first select the areas of knowledge which are relevant for basing a decision. At present there appear to be only two. One area is examining the origin of both primitive life and the subsequent development of intelligent life forms on our planet and use this information to assess roughly how likely such occurances are on other planets. The other area that appears to provide relevant evidence is that concerning whether GETI species have ever visited our solar system. How did life start on earth? Apparently it was in the sea. While life has existed in the ocean dating back about 4 billion years, evidence for land based life forms is much more recent -less than 1 billion years. How did life start in the sea? One hypothesis that has enjoyed some popularity is that life started in deep hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor. However recent research has eliminated this as a possibility due to instability of organics required for life near vents. *1 However a mechanism for generating large amounts of phosphates at least has been discovered. Volcanic activity can provide this via vented polyphosphates. *2 In general with so little hard information on the biochemistry involved in the origin of life no firm conclusions regarding the existence of GETI can be formed with this data. We do know that if the earth was either roughly 1% nearer or 10% farther from the sun water could not exist in the liquid state. If the earth was slightly more dense it would be a hellish inferno like venus, while if the earth was slightly less massive the atmosphere would be vented into space and a mars like situation would prevail. Even with this information while we can conclude that life as we know it is undoubtedly a rarity this does not preclude the existance of a substantial number of life bearing planets in our galaxy. However primitive life forms are not what we are looking for. In order for GETI to exist life must undergo a long process of evolution. If this process is gradual then we can be confident that intelligence can reasonably be expected to evolve after a few billion years. However on earth evolution of life was at a standstill for over 3 billion years until just 580 million years ago when oxygen levels increased to the point where multicellular organisms could exist. *3 In now appears that an important distinction must be made between the odds for life and those for intelligent life, with the later being much lower than the former. While this still does not preclude the existance of GETI, it does eliminate the possibility of there existing large numbers of ETI species in our galaxy. Intelligence is undoubtedly very rare. This brings us to the other fact of possible relevance regarding the existance of GETI. FACT A: They are not here now. Nor is there any evidence that they have ever visited our solar system in the past. FACT A has been accepted by astronomers defending the GETI concept and so we will not debate it. Although there have been reports of sightings of UFO's in the lay press by unreliable witnesses they are given no credence whatsoever by scientists and we will not concern ourselves with them any further. Since neither GETI itself nor any of their machine surrogates now exist in our solar system this has an unexpected and quite serious consequence. The argument runs that if a single GETI species decided at some point to explore and even colonize the galaxy they could do so at negligible expense by building a slow speed interstellar probe which possesses the ability to replicate itself. By thus seeding the galaxy with a few such probes, these would it time replicate themselves after reaching (some) star systems and then send their descendants out to further investigate and eventually saturate the galaxy. No such probe activity has been detected, therefore these probes do not exist, therefore the GETI species which launch them also do not exist. This conundrum for astronomers has been mercilessly elaborated to point where there appears to remain no rational objections capable of refuting its conclusion. *4 *5 *6 *7 Technical objections to the possiblity of building a reasonably inexpensive self replicating interstellar probe have all been eliminated and the feasibility of their construction has been conceded by all scientists party to the GETI debate. One obvious and seemingly quite effective objection is that advanced GETI civilizations might not possess any particular motivation for sending probes. Unfortunately this objection has also been refuted as in order to be valid it would have to apply to all GETI civilizations continuously over the entire period of their existence. Another argument defending GETI concedes that while many probes have indeed been launched because of their slow rate of speed they would take upwards to a billion years to blanket the galaxy. *8 This argument admits however that at most only one probe launching GETI civilization existed just one billion years ago. GETI civilizations thus are conceded to be a relatively recent phenomina. Also independant evaluations of the period required to explore the galaxy vary greatly, with the billion year mark being very much a high ball figure. Another and rather chilling objection is that some deadly probes were launched to destroy all civilizations they came in contact with. *9 However this also concedes that while GETI civilizations once existed, they are no more. It is fortunate for us that this objection itself is vulnerable to refutation. Deadly probes only have to miss one GETI civilization long enough for it to launch defender probes to turn this scenario into a machine battle which would in time reduce the galaxy to rubble. Also the most effective way for deadly probes to destroy all civilization would be to sterilize all planets before intelligent species can develop, thus we would never have existed. The success of the self replicating interstellar probes argument is now widely regarded by most scientists as virtually eliminating the possibility of the existance of GETI species, though not of primitive extraterrestrial life forms. Like the relentless liquid metal terminator robot featured in a recent movie the probes argument is an unexpected adversary that self-repairs any holes in its substance created by criticisms and is fully capable of crushing any and all rational opposition to its conclusion. Even die hard astronomers are now throwing in the towel. *10 Perhaps all this should not come as any great surprise afterall. Life cannot exist without heavy atoms such as carbon, which did not exist in the early universe. These atoms were first created in the center of stars and were then only dispersed after these early stars became supernovas. Thus our entire "local bubble" universe was sterile for roughly the first 6 billion years of its total 12 billion year lifespan. Since intelligent life could evolve only after a further delay of at least several billion years then as far as intelligent life is concerned our universe is not old at all, but is still only a baby. In particular there has to be a first technological civilization in our galaxy and it appears that we are probably it. If there is to be any consolation it is that our biological and electronic descendents stand to inherit a considerable amount of galactic real estate. Perhaps one day these descendents will meet up with the probes launched eons ago by extragalactic ETI, which are even now slowly making their way to our home -the milky way galaxy. *1 "Submarine Hot Springs and the Origin of Life" 609-611 Vol.334 1988 Nature *2 "Volcanic Production of Polyphosphates and its Relevance to Prebiotic Evolution" 516-519 Vol.352 1991 Nature *3 "End of the Proterozoic Eon" 64-73 October 1991 Scientific American *4 "An Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth" 128-135 Vol.16 1975 Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society *5 "Extraterrestrial Intelligent Beings do not Exist" 267-281 Vol.21 Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society *6 "A Brief History of the Extraterrestrial Intelligence Concept" 133-145 Vol.22 1981 Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society *7 "Additional Remarks on Extraterrestrial Intelligence" 279-292 Vol.22 1981 Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society *8 "The Solipsist Approach to Extraterrestrial Intelligence" 113-121 Vol.24 1983 Qu Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=5545