X-Message-Number: 6573 From: John de Rivaz <> Newsgroups: sci.cryonics Subject: Re: wanted in future? Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 11:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <> References: <4sjij7$> <4sreqp$> In article: <4sreqp$> (Dr. Jim Stevenson) writes: > YOu can put as much extra money as you want in a sepret trust, managed > either by your chosen cryonics organization, or by your children. > > The cryonics company has many reasons, legal and social, to do its best to > revive all its patients. I can only speak for myself, but I would > adamatly prefer a good chance of having my loved parents as friends, > in the future, when their deterioration of aging is reversed, than the > largest imaginable enharitence. An excellent idea. However I suspect that it is in the best interests of the cryonics organisations to have people "overfund" in order to provide extra capital for emergencies or if the costs of reanimation are not as small as the nanotechnology adherents suggest, or if costs rise before the suspension takes place. I do agree, though, if you can buy in friends and relations they will get the cryonics meme more easily than if you have to persuade them to make financial commitment. They may even turn out to be the people who ensure your own suspension (unless you happen to live on the doorstep of a cryonics organisation.) If you are able to use a trust and invest in technology stocks, you should increase the value sufficiently to take in partners if you use the Cryonics Institute. [The suspension costs at other organisations inflate, which means they grow alongside your trust unless you are spectacularly successful. They outgrow life insurance, of course.] -- Sincerely, **************************************** * Publisher of Longevity Report * John de Rivaz * Fractal Report * * details on request * **************************************** In the information age, sharing can increase world wealth enormously, because giving information does not decrease your information. http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JohndeR Fast loading, very few slow pictures Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6573