X-Message-Number: 6656 From: Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 21:00:55 -0700 Subject: SCI.CRYONICS Prometheus and Nanotechnology -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In #6647 (Thomas Donaldson) on Tue, 30 Jul 1996 Wrote: >Perhaps I am too harsh here, but I detect in those who don't >want to pledge "because they think Nanotechnology will be >needed for revival" are simply making excuses and shoving >their problems off onto theology and metaphysics. No, I don't think you're being too harsh. I've often disagreed with Thomas but NOT this time, I think he's 100% correct. We don't know how much damage the current methods of freezing cause to the brain, personally I think Nanotechnology probably has a good chance of repairing that damage, but I don't know that for a fact, and nobody knows how long it will take to develop Nanotechnology, and anyway "probably" is just not good enough. Think how embarrassing it will be if years from now we find that there was a simple way to preserve brains without damage and that method was within the means of late 20'th century technology, but we didn't find it because we didn't bother to look. A million dollars a year for 10 years may seem like a lot of money to us when we're begging for dollars, but it's peanuts compared to money spent on far less important health research projects. In spite of this it would be far, far, more money than was ever spent on brain preservation, the low hanging fruit has not been picked yet. Most people, myself included, thought that Nanotechnology or advanced genetic engineering would be needed to repair a spinal cord that had been severed, but now according to a recent report by Cheng, Olson, and Cao (July 26, 1996 Science) a simple surgical procedure may solve the problem, at least it works in rats. In the same way, it's possible that Prometheus might find something much simpler than Nanotechnology that would get the job done, and even if does not it will certainly find new knowledge for mankind that could help us all. This is virgin intellectual territory, almost everything seen will be new. John K Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.i iQCzAgUBMgApsn03wfSpid95AQHdQQTvUBKIhEYBkGPU2JZ6OJQMZTujuBe9F7FD FUmMXssMd2tqJCJh1nWB0KqGPitoPx8ql+0OS5OtI+XPvSODuw0jUywzKbdmpt3/ fIb25WBasReBfAD4bg83UtWO8z6GywXZtO1cegvIrCmwWj8cy7XFED2LtpWd7SlM ygFrQFPL5L2trBEfmIQNS+y5L4AtpIfFrSpr4jfF4fJjPC39ILc= =ojI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6656