X-Message-Number: 6936
From:  (Brian Wowk)
Newsgroups: sci.cryonics
Subject: Re: questions, focus
Date: 18 Sep 96 05:39:01 GMT
Message-ID: <>
References: <51koj9$> <>

In <> Terry Lambert <> writes:

>Brian Wowk seems to have a similar rigor requirement, but he
>unfortunately couches it in terms of initial assumptions
>about "what a successful suspension protocol must look like"
>(specifically, I refer to his cooling rate requirements).

	We know what successful suspension protocols on
humans must look like in terms of cooling rates because
of basic physics issues.  But hopefully I made that clear
in another post.


>If one takes Bob Ettinger statements at face value, what he is
>asking for, in terms of a "Prometheus Project Precursor", is
>that you start your payments now instead of later.  This does
>not seem to be inconsistent or in conflict with the goals of
>either project... though it may be in conflict with the personal
>goals of project advocates.

	As long as PPP and PP both adhere to the principles of

	* approval of plans 

	* assured access to technology by contributors

I agree. 

 ***************************************************************************
 Brian Wowk          CryoCare Foundation               1-800-TOP-CARE
 President           Human Cryopreservation Services   
    http://www.cryocare.org/cryocare/
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6936