X-Message-Number: 6936 From: (Brian Wowk) Newsgroups: sci.cryonics Subject: Re: questions, focus Date: 18 Sep 96 05:39:01 GMT Message-ID: <> References: <51koj9$> <> In <> Terry Lambert <> writes: >Brian Wowk seems to have a similar rigor requirement, but he >unfortunately couches it in terms of initial assumptions >about "what a successful suspension protocol must look like" >(specifically, I refer to his cooling rate requirements). We know what successful suspension protocols on humans must look like in terms of cooling rates because of basic physics issues. But hopefully I made that clear in another post. >If one takes Bob Ettinger statements at face value, what he is >asking for, in terms of a "Prometheus Project Precursor", is >that you start your payments now instead of later. This does >not seem to be inconsistent or in conflict with the goals of >either project... though it may be in conflict with the personal >goals of project advocates. As long as PPP and PP both adhere to the principles of * approval of plans * assured access to technology by contributors I agree. *************************************************************************** Brian Wowk CryoCare Foundation 1-800-TOP-CARE President Human Cryopreservation Services http://www.cryocare.org/cryocare/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=6936