X-Message-Number: 8016 From: (Thomas Donaldson) Subject: Re: CryoNet #7993 - #7997 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 01:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Hi again! I don't have much time before bedtime, so I'll just say a few words to Mike about his ideas, and maybe a sentence for Mr. Clark. I was not saying that these hypothetical aliens were at all inferior to us. They could be SUPERIOR. Yes, if we take 2 human beings and find that one of them has lots of trouble with math, we'd suspect that the one that finds math difficult has a problem. But when you open the door not only to other species with totally different history and evolution, but also to what we ourselves may become in 10,000 years or 1,000,000 years, it's far from obvious to me that we will retain mathematics. Like I said, it may be forgotten as one of the crutches used by our savage ancestors to get some very dim idea of how the universe works. And how would we recognize such creatures? We would recognize them for what they could DO. And though in our blindness we might not at first see just what they were, we might come to see that, too --- by the fact that all our efforts for hundreds of years utterly failed to explain HOW they could do what they could do. (Happily this is only hypothetical. I will say, though, that given the age of the Galaxy it's far more likely that any other "intelligent!!!???" race would be so far in advance of us that we might not even see, at first, that they were intelligent. But what I really think is that we are alone, at least for megaparsecs around). I like math, enjoy thinking about it, have written long papers on some sides of it, and all the rest. And as I said before, the best way we have to someday pass beyond math is to continue DOIMG math. But I also think that math has no more claim to universality than any other human construction. And finally, to Mr. Clark: I do hope you have noticed that neurons, as are all cells, are almost the classic case of nanomachines, and to raise the issue of nanotechnology here is just a little absurd. They are, in fact, the current best example of what such machines might do... and I note that no one has yet actually built anything to match them, despite all the theory. Long long life, Thomas Donaldson Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=8016