X-Message-Number: 9588 From: Ettinger <> Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 19:18:05 EDT Subject: Messages Received MESSAGES RECEIVED Whatever messages Saul Kent and some of his associates think they are sending, the messages actually received, in my opinion, are mostly as follows: "If you join a cryonics organization, or remain a member of one, you are deluded and wasting your money. And you had better give heavy weight to my opinion, because I was a cryonics pioneer before I saw the light and rejected cryonics." "If you are in early danger of death, lie down and die quietly and save your money for your heirs or some worthy cause, preferably a research project that I endorse. If a relative is near death, give her a decent burial, or a cheap cremation." "If you are young, give all your discretionary cash to the research projects I endorse. If we achieve suspended animation in the next ten or twenty years, and if you can then afford the cost (almost certainly very high), then you have a good chance of indefinitely extended life." "If you are in the leadership of a cryonics organization, urge your members to use all available cash and all available energies to support of my research projects. Distribute my message as widely and as emphatically as you can, and discontinue or at least minimize your recruitment efforts and your own research efforts." "If you have any dirt or any suspicions or negative opinions about other people in cryonics, be sure to shout it to the rooftops, because full and free expression is the lifeblood of science and the hallmark of a free society." "When you have made the sensible decision to forget cryonics, stick around the cryonics discussion groups anyway and stick it to them. It's your civic and scientific duty, and fun too, and cheap." "When I was young and stupid, I read THE PROSPECT OF IMMORTALITY, the central thesis of which was that we have an appreciable chance to avoid permanent death through biostasis--even if that means a straight freeze within a reasonable time after clinical death. I didn't really buy that at the time, but thought that, with enough research, methods might be developed that would offer a reasonable chance. Now I realize that even the best methods developed since then (by my colleagues) leave the corpse merely an expensive corpse. The establishment physicians and cryobiologists were right all along: if we can't get the deep-frozen dog to stand up and bark after thawing, right now, forget it. It makes no sense to invest money, hope and effort in a mere possibility. Cryonics is nonsense, and only a few neurotics are dumb enough to buy it." Could I be wrong about these messages received? Some of them, maybe. We'll know more if some newcomers and lurkers (not just the usual suspects) chime in with their impressions. Robert Ettinger Cryonics Institute Immortalist Society http://www.cryonics.org Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=9588