| Results 41 - 50 of 60 | Search Time 0.039 Seconds |
| Msg | Description |
| # 30529 | Some Followup on the Alcor Self-Electing Board Issue [Finance Department] |
|
gmail.com>
Subject: Some Followup on the Alcor Self-Electing Board Issue
------=_Part_10091_22822191.1203908316803
Content- . . . philosophy? Either way it is inconsistent with Alcor members not having the
freedom to elect . . . who thinks every new post about the Alcor
self-electing board issue is just more . . . in point: His pretended worrying
about how Alcor should count instances of X - a distraction . . . And Crouse, of all things, thinks that Alcor's political setup is
satisfactory to him, being "republic oriented (rather) than democracy
oriented." Had he been reading the information (Sun, 24 Feb 2008, 5 KB) |
|
| # 22064 | Re: Libertarians and cryonics [Swb1948] |
|
libertarian or even democratic.
>The lack of democracy is a threat. More democratic organization could
> . . . will pretty much like what happened with Alcor in 1993. My personal feeling is that (Tue, 24 Jun 2003, 8 KB) |
|
| # 1336 | [Charles Platt] |
|
a way of reaching more people.
But Alcor (or any other cryonics organization) would do . . . institutionalize it; hence the party
system of democracy, which is designed to monitor and
restrain (19 Nov 92 10:29:29, 6 KB) |
|
| # 1509 | Re Saul, the FDA, and history [hkhenson] |
|
of
the political battle for control of Alcor, but I still am opposed to
the . . . about
>the political pull of Saul at Alcor, but I only see this in terms
>of the fact that cryonics is not a democracy, nor is meant to be.
>Does Saul (Thu, 24 Dec 92, 13 KB) |
|
| # 4688 | Organizations, survival, and 10% [Steve Bridge] |
|
14:04:07
From: Steve Bridge <steve@alcor.org>
Subject: Organizations, survival, and 10%
To CryoNet
>From Steve Bridge, Alcor
July 30, 1995
In reply to various . . . length, since I'm really here at Alcor on Sunday to work on
other projects. . . . to be spoken of, apart from UK Alcor (?).
I think Australian cryonics is slowly headed . . . group, and they have many people
interested. Alcor and cryonics are getting a huge amount ( . . . Icon," instead of truly
protecting freedom and democracy. They place the flag above freedom of
(Sun, 30 Jul 95, 14 KB) |
|
| # 30056 | Re: Stodolsky questions [David Stodolsky] |
|
In the cited cryonet
> archive he
> says Alcor spent $100,000 in legal costs, which . . . different coroner. Can he be serious? Was Alcor
> supposed to
> divine in advance that this . . . else? As they say, get real.
If ALCOR's survival was critically dependent on the . . . a reasonable campaign contribution. This is what
ALCOR is doing right now with the business . . . no means
> a disaster. On the contrary, Alcor won the legal battles and a
> growth . . . Stodolsky, D. S. (2002). Computer-network based democracy: Scientific
communication as a basis for governance. (Fri, 23 Nov 2007, 7 KB) |
|
| # 22068 | Re: Libertarians and cryonics [David Stodolsky] |
|
libertarian or even democratic.
>
>> The lack of democracy is a threat. More democratic organization could
>> . . . will pretty much like what
> happened with Alcor in 1993.
I was referring to the (Tue, 24 Jun 2003, 7 KB) |
|
| # 30275 | Re: [Advisors] According to Merkle "We directors are like God... [David Stodolsky] |
|
a
"democratic system". See for example, Post-democracy by Collin Crouch,
a thin volume well . . . Government nor what is being
proposed is democracy. Both are republican systems of governance, that
. . . result of the current governance arrangements at ALCOR.
I got info from CI and was (Tue, 8 Jan 2008, 2 KB) |
|
| # 30571 | Alcor board knew it would go away if they just gave it time [Finance Department] |
|
From: "Finance Department" <knotwiller@gmail.com>
Subject: Alcor board knew it would go away if . . . it rest.
The advocates for freedom and democracy in cryonics have seemingly run out
of (Mon, 3 Mar 2008, 2 KB) |
|
| # 21840 | Regulation, liberty, and the survival of cryonics organizations [Charles Platt] |
|
are enacted by elected representatives in a democracy. (Actually the
United States is a democratic republic, not a pure democracy, but this is a
secondary, although non . . . Charles Platt
(writing for myself, not necessarily Alcor)
(Sat, 31 May 2003, 8 KB) |
| CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|