| Results 1 - 10 of 851 | Search Time 0.016 Seconds |
| Msg | Description |
| # 18629 | Drexler Nanotech [josuzar.il] |
|
il" <josuzar.il@netzero.net>
Subject: Drexler Nanotech
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:40: (Fri, 22 Feb 2002, 1 KB) |
|
| # 18630 | A book recommendation [John Grigg] |
|
have seen some posts talking about Drexler nanotech and other nanotech. My question is what (Sat, 23 Feb 2002, 1 KB) |
|
| # 19737 | re: Michael Shermer and cryonics [Jeff Davis] |
|
Stix which
oh-so-knowingly declared that nanotech was bunk.
Drexler and Merkle got dissed (Fri, 9 Aug 2002, 5 KB) |
|
| # 14165 | Stirring the pot [James Swayze] |
|
say. I saved this post from the Nanotech list some
time ago. All credit goes (Mon, 24 Jul 2000, 18 KB) |
|
| # 564 | #554 - Cryonics Debate [Contractor] |
|
the DNA/RNA of the cells. A nanotech might be
> developed that would repair the (Mon, 2 Dec 91, 3 KB) |
|
| # 21061 | CryoNet #21030 - #21036 [Thomas Donaldson] |
|
neurons:
if you have an assembly of nanotech devices cooperating on that
task, then as (Wed, 5 Feb 2003, 2 KB) |
|
| # 23016 | The Nanogirl News~ [Gina Miller] |
|
called molecular nanotechnology,
a theoretical approach to nanotech that proposes the creation of "molecular
assemblers," (Thu, 4 Dec 2003, 17 KB) |
|
| # 7366 | London Sunday Times on Future Science & Cryonics [Randy] |
|
on future science;
includes brief nod to nanotech & cryonics. Nanotech scientist Smalley
and Alcor's (Sat, 28 Dec 1996, 1 KB) |
|
| # 23910 | nanotech article [David Miller] |
|
Apr 2004 01:15:40 -0500
Subject: nanotech article
"Will nanotech save the world or (Sat, 17 Apr 2004, 1 KB) |
|
| # 20863 | No new breakthroughs needed [James Swayze] |
|
m in the augment human
intelligence via nanotech as the best route to reach our (Tue, 14 Jan 2003, 2 KB) |
| CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|