| Results 411 - 420 of 851 | Search Time 0.008 Seconds |
| Msg | Description |
| # 18360 | I made a bet! [John Grigg] |
|
within our lifetime. I explained how with nanotech we would see home models within twenty (Wed, 16 Jan 2002, 1 KB) |
|
| # 19785 | Re: Probabilities [Ralph C. Merkle] |
|
cryonics
organization) correlates with P3 (development of nanotech), P4 (survival of
society), P6 (someone in (Mon, 12 Aug 2002, 5 KB) |
|
| # 791 | Re: cryonics: #780 - #786 [Thomas Donaldson] |
|
construction of a "new body" out
of nanotech machines, computers, or any other "new devices". (02 May 92 09:36:53, 3 KB) |
|
| # 4300 | Random Thoughts on Nanotechnology <MAC TONNIES> [N E U R O M A N C E R] |
|
was
dismayed to read his portrayal of nanotech thirty-some years from the
present. He (Wed, 26 Apr 1995, 2 KB) |
|
| # 15878 | [off topic] Singularity... Bah Humbug! [Eugene.Leitl] |
|
press once again misunderstood something quite profoundly.
> Nanotech should be able to reduce the size (Sat, 17 Mar 2001, 8 KB) |
|
| # 15766 | "Rebels Against the Future" [Mark Plus] |
|
patenting genes!" or "They have 1,200
nanotech patents!" It seems that few of the (Wed, 28 Feb 2001, 10 KB) |
|
| # 19303 | The Nanogirl News~ [Gina Miller] |
|
companies are just
now embracing and hyping nanotech as a "new" technology, Intel has been
(Tue, 18 Jun 2002, 16 KB) |
|
| # 5498 | In my lifetime? [John K Clark] |
|
long it will take to produce
>working nanotech, do they?
Eric Drexler has proven the (Fri, 29 Dec 1995, 4 KB) |
|
| # 13592 | Re: CryoNet #13575 [Azt28] |
|
how much longer will it take for nanotech?
>
> Because if I had to choose between (Wed, 19 Apr 2000, 2 KB) |
|
| # 12615 | Question for Mike Darwin [Aber106839] |
|
organ
cryopreservation is possible at all? (Without nanotech, just using biological
means). Is it true (Fri, 22 Oct 1999, 1 KB) |
| CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|