Results 591 - 600 of 851 | Search Time 0.008 Seconds |
Msg | Description |
# 15879 | savants; happiness [Ettinger] |
be able to grow a factory
with nanotech, once you were able to design and (Sat, 17 Mar 2001, 3 KB) |
|
# 22903 | Re: CryoNet #22891 - #22894 [Kennita Watson] |
extend this, not to mention
pre-reanimation nanotech and biotech.
Besides, doesn't Alcor invest (Fri, 21 Nov 2003, 2 KB) |
|
# 18605 | Fredkin's Digital Philosophy (was Re: Uploading: dt & time shuffles) [Tim Freeman] |
being and humanity doesn't have
the nanotech problem solved yet, so chemistry determines my (Wed, 20 Feb 2002, 2 KB) |
|
# 28644 | Cryo Forum blurbs [Jonathan Hinek] |
Lord and Savior.
I gather that "real" nanotech looks less likely to head in the
(Tue, 7 Nov 2006, 2 KB) |
|
# 13086 | Re: non-EMS cryonics [D.den Otter] |
be kept in cheap mass suspension until nanotech
etc. can be used to create automated (Sat, 15 Jan 2000, 2 KB) |
|
# 21658 | Re: #21657: Reply on Advanced Civilizations [Keith Henson] |
as you want if you (as any nanotech
based life form should) have control over (Thu, 24 Apr 2003, 5 KB) |
|
# 17277 | Re: CryoNet #17267 Anarchy is bad? [Azt28] |
framework and anarchy
don't need full nanotech to start. The only request is some (Wed, 15 Aug 2001, 2 KB) |
|
# 14951 | new procedures [Ettinger] |
like
many others--will need high level nanotech for repair.
Despite the limited evidence at (Sat, 18 Nov 2000, 4 KB) |
|
# 3122 | Download Privacy; Research Money [Richard Schroeppel] |
seems adequate, even if it requires inventing nanotech to succeed.
We'd need a real (Mon, 12 Sep 1994, 3 KB) |
|
# 17178 | Re: CryoNet #17172 Ettinger on nano tech. [Azt28] |
I think that way wiill be insufficient.
Nanotech will be requested at both scale: micro (Thu, 2 Aug 2001, 3 KB) |
CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|