| Results 701 - 710 of 851 | Search Time 0.008 Seconds |
| Msg | Description |
| # 12251 | further comments for George Smith and Bob Ettinger [Thomas Donaldson] |
|
likely to have to design our own nanotech
devices to do the required repair. A (Fri, 13 Aug 1999, 4 KB) |
|
| # 1555 | replies [Thomas Donaldson] |
|
more perfect bodies, when they come with Nanotech-
nology, resembles the Christian notion. And along (Thu, 7 Jan 93, 4 KB) |
|
| # 15259 | Re: trade-offs in choosing protocols [Charles Platt] |
|
sobering effect even on the most hardcore nanotech
believers--if they would actually bother to (Thu, 4 Jan 2001, 8 KB) |
|
| # 16668 | do-it-yourself, continued [Charles Platt] |
|
generally agreed (even by the most optimistic nanotech enthusiast) to be
zero, the organization has (Sun, 24 Jun 2001, 11 KB) |
|
| # 878 | Macro-damage [Ronald Hale-Evans] |
|
This holds only for the present; with nanotech,
presumably stroke injury would be relatively easy (Thu, 4 Jun 1992, 4 KB) |
|
| # 100 | Summary of First 100 Messages [Kevin Q. Brown] |
|
32 33 1724 Oct 25 STM/AFM nanotech news
33 127 6661 Oct 25 number (26 Jun 1989 , 6 KB) |
|
| # 7752 | Reply to Bob Ettinger [Brian Wowk] |
|
elevate it above conjecture!) that full-fledged nanotech may be both
>necessary and sufficient to (Mon, 24 Feb 1997, 4 KB) |
|
| # 1615 | sci.cryonics reader statistics [Kevin Q Brown] |
|
0 0% 0.01 1.1% sci.nanotech
. . .
1147 10000 288 60% 68 347.0 (1 Jan 1993 20:42:34, 3 KB) |
|
| # 795 | neurosuspension [Hal Finney] |
|
process on a computer and then using nanotech to build an
identical final product), we (Sat, 2 May 92, 5 KB) |
|
| # 13 | reply to questions (continued) [Kevin Q. Brown] |
|
cryonics standards, 16 out of 4700
sci.nanotech readers (1 out of 300) is actually (24 Aug 1988 , 12 KB) |
| CryoNet Home |
Database last updated 17 Mar 2011
|